Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Corey Grinder's avatar

Thank you. While many attempt to extrapolate that church at Antioch to embrace or umbrella their own purpose and praxis, your article seems to make the thread of connection between Acts 11, Ephesians 4 and Romans 16 vibrate and glow with meaning!

Expand full comment
Carl Olson's avatar

This is helpful for understanding the role, nature, and relationship that hubs/networks have within a city for helping to nourish (and come alongside of) what the Spirit is doing through the formation of microchurches across a region.

I appreciated hearing that networks should "embrace diversity" and "leverage the full range of expressions in your network." It also got me wondering for my context. Could this mean that it's okay (and helpful to the movement) to have churches that are embracing "missional/gospel communities" but still follow a more centralized model of church life (including them in the early stages of building the network)? Is there a caution to having too many of these particular church models in your network (in contrast to more decentralized expressions)?

In my particular city, there are no official microchurch expressions (yet). We have many relationships across the city and with many churches (and sense that the Spirit is preparing the church here for a move towards a decentralized model). But currently, it feels like a person (or group of people desiring a hub/network) would have to work with the existing expressions of churches that appear to follow the prevailing centralized models (alongside of these more centralized church's attempts to lean into some aspects of missional/gospel community life).

Appreciate any insight. Grace and peace.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts