Alan Hirsch: Energizing Microchurch Movements with Hubs and Networks
How do we reactivate the Antioch Impulse? How do we equip for distributed influence with the same DNA?
By Alan Hirsch
When we talk about hubs in a microchurch movement, the church in Antioch stands as one of the clearest biblical prototypes. This wasn’t a satellite community or regional outpost. Antioch emerged as a Spirit-empowered apostolic center—a missional nerve center that shaped the trajectory of the early church.
First introduced in Acts 11, Antioch immediately reveals a dynamic quite different from that of Jerusalem. While Jerusalem remained rooted in a more Hebraic cultural framework and still wrestled with the boundaries of Gentile inclusion, Antioch was cross-cultural, diverse, and outward-facing. It represented the first truly intercultural expression of the Church—birthed not by strategy but by persecution-fueled diaspora—and quickly became the launchpad for a missionary movement that would ultimately saturate the Roman Empire.
Antioch wasn’t a holding tank for talent—it was a launching pad for mission. That’s what makes it the biblical blueprint for hub dynamics in any movement. It stands as a prototype of a networked, empowered, and Spirit-responsive community, leveraging its leadership capacity not to build bigger programs, but to release catalytic agents into the harvest field.
🌱🕸️🌿 Missional Identity
“We’re not introducing a new idea—we’re recovering an ancient pattern.”
Today, when we speak of hubs in microchurch networks, we’re reactivating the Antioch impulse. We’re not managing a ministry—we’re stewarding a movement. And movements flourish when we build trellises strong enough to support the wild, fruit-bearing vine that God is already growing.
Hubs and Nodes
Anyone seeking to grow a microchurch movement across a city or region must commit to cultivating a citywide network built on hubs and nodes. It may sound obvious: if you want to reach an entire city, you need to decentralize and empower the edges. But in practice, very few churches fully embrace this model. Most default to spider-like, centralized structures of organization and leadership—models where control and function remain concentrated at the center. As a result, they miss the opportunity to unleash distributed influence and tap into the full potential of the body across the city.
A starfish approach, by contrast, pushes power and function outward. It intentionally structures itself to empower the edge. This model is built not on control, but on trust, adaptability, and the conviction that the whole thrives when every part is activated and engaged.
🔹 Hub Purpose
“Hubs don’t control the network. They nourish it.”
Hubs act as catalytic centers of energy and coordination that give the network strength and direction. In a microchurch movement, hubs function like the heart of the body—pumping vision, resources, and leadership throughout the system. They are often anchored in strategic areas or entrusted to gifted leaders who carry the weight of regional, movement-level influence. Hubs don’t control the network—they nourish it—offering training, fostering innovation, and creating spaces where relationships deepen and ideas take root.
Think again of Antioch. It wasn’t just another gathering place—it was a launchpad. Missionaries were sent, strategies were shaped, and new communities were birthed. In my view, it is the quintessential prototype of a missional hub.
Antioch didn’t emerge from a top-down strategy but through Spirit-empowered movement from the margins. It was born out of the scattering caused by persecution (Acts 11) and quickly developed into the first intercultural, decentralized apostolic center. Unlike Jerusalem—with its temple-adjacent and centralized paradigm—Antioch became the place where Gentile mission was not only permitted but ignited. It served as the spiritual basecamp for gospel expansion throughout the empire.
Antioch wasn’t built to retain leaders—it was built to release them. When the Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul…” (Acts 13:2), the church responded with obedience, prayer, and commissioning. This is the dynamic heartbeat of a true hub.
In 5Q, I explore how the fivefold typology in Ephesians 4 is not just a leadership construct—it is the living intelligence of the Church. At Antioch, we see apostles and prophets discerning together. Teachers ground the movement. Evangelists ignite the flame. Shepherds nurture the sent. This fivefold ecosystem cultivates an environment where the Church doesn’t merely grow—it multiplies and matures.
When we talk about hubs today, we’re not introducing a new model—we’re recovering an ancient pattern. Whether it’s a neighborhood pulsing with creative leadership or a regional team equipping microchurches across a geography, what matters most is the capacity to connect, empower, and multiply. Like Antioch, modern hubs must be both equipping centers and launch platforms—vital for sustaining momentum and shaping the trajectory of the whole movement.
Networks: The Connective Tapestry
Imagine every microchurch in your city not as a solitary flame, but as part of a luminous web—a living network of faith, mission, and shared purpose. These networks are the invisible threads that hold the movement together. They create space for mutual encouragement, resource-sharing, and strategic collaboration across neighborhoods, cultures, and contexts.
🔹 Network Dynamics
“Networks are the invisible threads that hold the movement together—relational, resilient, and alive.”
Networks prevent isolation and burnout by fostering deep relational bonds and a sense of belonging to something greater. Within these webs, ideas travel, wisdom is exchanged, and momentum builds. What emerges is not just a collection of churches, but a citywide ecosystem where the gospel flows organically, creatively, and powerfully through every intersection of life.
This is the kind of apostolic ecology we see in Acts—not centralized, but connected. Not top-down, but relationally energized.
The Synergy of Networks and Hubs
The real magic happens when networks and hubs work in tandem—like peanut butter and jelly. Networks nurture the relational energy across the movement, while hubs channel resources and strategic direction to where they’re most needed. This synergy creates a framework that is both resilient and adaptable, capable of responding to the changing needs of the movement.
In The Permanent Revolution, we describe this as movemental intelligence—the capacity to architect a system that is both structured and fluid, both grounded and generative. When networks form the relational tissue and hubs act as catalytic equipping centers, the result is a living system that mirrors the nature of the early church: decentralized but connected, local but global, wild but intentional.
Some Possible Steps to Spark Your Movement:
Cultivate Community: Foster an open, inclusive environment where connections thrive. Relationships are the heartbeat of your network.
Strengthen Your Hubs: Identify and nurture key hubs that will drive innovation and equip leaders. These centers sustain momentum and strategic focus.
Embrace Diversity: Leverage the full range of expressions within your network to build a richer, more adaptable movement.
Live the Incarnational Gospel: Be present in your community. Embody the message of Jesus in tangible, everyday ways.
By strategically using networks and hubs, you create a fertile environment for microchurch movements to thrive across your city. As you build these connections and elevate your hubs, you're not just expanding the reach of your movement—you’re recovering the dynamic pattern of the early church. You’re laying the groundwork for transformational impact that aligns with the mission of God.
Antioch wasn’t a megachurch. It wasn’t a broadcast brand. It was a missional engine—relationally rich, theologically grounded, and radically sent. And it still offers us a blueprint for today.
Let’s take it seriously. Let’s build hubs that send, and networks that sustain. The future of the Church depends on it.
Thank you. While many attempt to extrapolate that church at Antioch to embrace or umbrella their own purpose and praxis, your article seems to make the thread of connection between Acts 11, Ephesians 4 and Romans 16 vibrate and glow with meaning!
This is helpful for understanding the role, nature, and relationship that hubs/networks have within a city for helping to nourish (and come alongside of) what the Spirit is doing through the formation of microchurches across a region.
I appreciated hearing that networks should "embrace diversity" and "leverage the full range of expressions in your network." It also got me wondering for my context. Could this mean that it's okay (and helpful to the movement) to have churches that are embracing "missional/gospel communities" but still follow a more centralized model of church life (including them in the early stages of building the network)? Is there a caution to having too many of these particular church models in your network (in contrast to more decentralized expressions)?
In my particular city, there are no official microchurch expressions (yet). We have many relationships across the city and with many churches (and sense that the Spirit is preparing the church here for a move towards a decentralized model). But currently, it feels like a person (or group of people desiring a hub/network) would have to work with the existing expressions of churches that appear to follow the prevailing centralized models (alongside of these more centralized church's attempts to lean into some aspects of missional/gospel community life).
Appreciate any insight. Grace and peace.